The United States Supreme Court rejected a challenge Wednesday from Republican-led states over the Biden administration's efforts to limit misinformation online.
The case stems from a lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri and five individuals, arguing that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment when it contacted social media companies such as Facebook and YouTube in 2022 and asked them to take down misleading information, particularly about the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election.
The plaintiffs argued that it should be up to social media sites — as private companies — to determine what content and opinions are allowed on their platforms. They also accused the White House of attempting to silence conservative viewpoints online.
The Biden administration argued that if the companies see misinformation with issues of national security or misinforming the general public, they should be able to step in and ask these companies to remove information that could potentially be detrimental.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court threw out lower court rulings that sided with the plaintiffs argument that the Biden administration unconstitutionally attempted to oppress conservative viewpoints online. Justice Amy Coney Barrett issued the majority opinion, stating that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue.
"To establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will suffer an injury that is traceable to a Government defendant and redressable by the injunction they seek," she wrote. "Because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction."
